Killing the Locals
Egypt, 18th Dynasty, 1300s B.C. Caucasoid Egyptians are doing what they do: growing things, keeping records, deleting the past and replacing it with retconned sequels, building elaborate stone tombs, and establishing local nature-based gods that they worship in a regular, communal way, akin to supporting the local football team or attending parent-group meetings. Their comparative plenty, cleanliness, softness, and symmetry prove attractive prizes, ergo they're regularly fighting off Nubians (Negroids; "blacks") from the south and Libyans (Negroids and some Mongoloid-Negroids; "blacks" or "Arabs") from the west, other Caucasoids from the north and northeast, and Mongoloids and mixed Mongoloid-Caucasoids ("Asiatics" or "Semites" or "Levantines") from the east and east-northeast. Egypt is then quite similar to its European contemporaries, in a way, with communal chronology and personally experienced nature-worship expressed through and personified via yellow/brownscale stone instead of gray, and by the Nile instead of by the forest. Storing food and supplies in granaries is of vast importance even without the cold weather that supposedly caused, Diamond-like, Euros and northeast Asians to develop future-time-orientation. Like its short-term counterpart, moderate-time-scale "nurture" theory fails again.
-Because Cheops' daughter can't set the mood all by herself.
Though later historians would be encouraged to speak of Rome, or perhaps Greece, as the first great Nu Euro empire to suddenly and inexplicably fall, 1300s B.C. Egypt stood on a similar precipice, and took similarly-leisurely steps toward its own demise. Over the next several centuries, Egypt's "culture" and "social preferences" were to change. Tomb construction would become more about pillaging and re-using components from older tombs than about designing woeful necropolises which showed respect to the Nu Euro's imaginarily-remembered god-ancestors. Canopic jars would become dummies, not as finely carved nor inhabited by actual fermented viscera, but standing in place as empty mimicries of the burials of the earlier pharaohs, whose own monuments had been stripped down to produce smaller imitations. All this would later be attested by intelligent Jewish scholars and gullible Nu Euro scholars as being due to an unexplained shift in "cultural preferences," or perhaps centurial weather patterns, and nothing more.
It is rather embarrassing to read histories of Egypt from Judaized/Hellenistic Greece onward. One can almost feel upon the page the authors' cognitive processes clenching tightly in refusal to eat the demographic broccoli. Why did Egypt suddenly become unable to "mount expeditions" to protect its southern cities against perpetually aggressive Nubian tribes? Why did Egypt stop producing fine literature and sculpture, and why did the latter-day pharaohs fabricate regional sinecures for their extended foreign relatives in attempts to use intermarriage with various foreign warlords to reduce pillage? Why did even Egypt's innermost cities fall into violent disrepair? As time passes, we forget much of what made the Old Kingdom different from the New.
Modern sociology was largely born from rationalization-attempts like these, whereby scholars are forced to conclude that the destruction of future African or European art, literature, stability, and society, result from the intrinsic organic choices of the inhabitants, who are themselves, genetically speaking, the same inhabitants that they always were. Much Egyptology over the past hundred years has been devoted to attempting to find nonexistent relics from later faux-pharaohs, then rationalizing how a partial settlement of nigh-hypothetical, artless mud-brick scratches indicates that traces of culture were indeed present in usurper dynasties, and that the people of the time had merely decided to adjust their religious practices.
Prior to this stage of the fall, religion remained a largely local affair. The village god, clan god, et cetera, existed in a decidedly Caucasoid way, wherein the existence of superior overgods ("Zeus" or "Ukko" or "Wotan" et cetera) was politely accepted but not spiritually definitive, in the sense that local deities and traditions were not swallowed up by foreign ones. Perhaps this arose due to a genuine belief in personified aspects of nature which happened to provide social cohesion as an unintended by-product, and perhaps due to a savvy understanding of communicating social cohesion via personified nature figures in which no one but children actually believed. In either case--reverent belief or applied practicality--worship was centered, for most people, around the local deity. Family tombs, Ahmose Six-Pack's funeral, cyclical holidays, marriages, births, socializing, donating temporal excesses for overall community well being, et cetera: these functions were accomplished via the symbolic and ritualistic language of the local deity.
The power of the NFL Commissioner is something of which Americans may be aware, but even now, Nu Euros cling to sentimental localism. Target tries to emphasize how much money it gives to YOUR local school, touring bands talk about how great it is to be HERE IN HOBOKEN WHERE THEY KNOW HOW TO ROCK, mega-agribusiness has partnership programs with the local strawberry farmer to set up shop at the farmer's market and talk about how helpful the "seed recycle" program has been for "growers here," and so forth.
The bureaucratic organism mandates this kind of nonsense. It is part of the transition to mass society, where local gods--sociocultural representations of shared awareness of the importance of physical contact in family and community, if you prefer--have to be subordinated to central control. In this, Amun-Ra's coming ascension would be somewhat representative of the struggle between communism and free markets, both in the aspect of repression of the individual's ability to live more independently rather than turn over more personal or local space to ideas and intruders supported by a central government, and as regards turning harvest taxes to the service of centralized policymaking exemplified by the singular god.
-Peaceful, hopeful Nubian future pyramid-designers and chariot-engineers seeking entry into Egypt, c. 1220 B.C.
Egypt finds itself the waypoint between Africa and Europe, and Asia and Africa. With success comes wealth, and Egypt's agricultural successes, and ability to store food for the long-term produce, as mentioned earlier, inviting prizes. Egypt has to constantly fight off raids to prevent granaries north of the San Ysidro checkpoint from turning into endless budget shortfalls, rolling brownouts, and gang rape.
-Unbeknownst to scholars from approximately 330 B.C. until at least 2017 C.E., the Congo is one of several thousand-mile-plus long rivers located on the continent of Africa. Its features include, but are not limited to, water, banks, wildlife, flooding, deltas, mud, clay, and vegetation. "The Nile" is certainly a wonderful thing and a wonderful resource, but it has been made out to be so nigh-sentient, and so important in recent histories, because it generated an architectural, record-keeping civilization, whereas all of the other rivers in Africa, even in much more moist, lush, habitable areas, failed to do so.
Obsessed with building monuments to the magical ancestors it is sure it has, Egypt makes mistakes: crafty administrators in nearby regions offer genetic alliances to help Egypt weather its troubles, of which troubles the mediators possess an uncannily detailed knowledge. Many Egyptian pharaohs, princes, wealthy families, and many more of its high priests and other officials, have fallen prey to half-Egyptian honeypots offered by trading soothsayers from among the nations to the east. The offspring of these honeypots jostle for power, supported by their genetic kindred in the priestly bureaucracy. It works, and Egyptian pharaohs begin to increase foreign settlement. They welcome cheap labor, mercenary service, and the "overlooked" guests who provide the ruling traitors a power base independent of the communities which created said traitors. The enemies Egypt had held off for so long ultimately conquer the territory so thoroughly that scholars a thousand years later call the invaders "Egyptians."
Ergo Egypt, 18th Dynasty, 1300s B.C. Many years into the above-discussed process, the pharaoh Amenhotep IV changes his name to Akhenaten, establishes a paradisical new city Akhetaten (sic), and decrees paganism ended by outlawing the authority of local teams and insisting on a single commissioning body to standardize the rules for nationwide boxing. (Waaah, waaah, no kicking, no scary knees nor elbows, no sustained clinching, and knocking me on the ground is not allowed!) The artifice of religion grows more extreme. Akhenaten potentially conceives of himself as the sun/son messenger/prophet of a singular multifaceted god, in which god is both the creator of the sun and the sun itself. When Akhenaten dies, everyone returns to local worship and defaces Akhenaten's stuff, but with a bend sinister toward monotheism: the sun god, Ra ("Amun-Ra"), becomes considered a more separate, all-powerful deity, from whom all other djinn, saints, angels, and popes emanated. This necessitated a different, more personal style of creation story, wherein Ra became the ultimate libertarian ideal: the self-generating god, no longer an aspect of nature (the nearest star) but a personified manifestation of singularity; a divine administrator to whom one could appeal for every aspect of life, rather than solely or primarily sun-related ones.
Why pray to the rain god for rain and the local god for healing when Ra can handle it all with one stop? Why go to the grocer's and then the hardware dude and then the tire place when you can get it all done at Walmart for one low price? Along with this philosophical shift came the necessary horsemen of bureaucratic headship, where Ra was both cosmically and minutely important, keeping all order in the universe yet still available for a thousand people to simultaneously ask for him to help their baseball team beat the baseball team for which a different thousand people the next city over were also at that time requesting victory. Correspondingly, grocers and librarians and housewares aisle-attendants stopped understanding their trades as much as they had before. Everything came from China, instructions on the box, uhh lemme see if my manager knows if it's okay to do that with it. We ad match.
A thousand years go by, slowly dominated by this new conception of a hypocritically personal/impersonal Amun-Ra, and the administrative system of all-access-Ra creates a standardized priestly template subject to its own European Union, whereby holy men no longer need to be from or educated by/in the community they serve, but must instead be educated in centralized Ra-ways and sent out to enforce decrees that benefit a small caste of handlers of the central authority. It was a gradual process, particularly given the technology then available, but it worked. Egypt never recovered, falling to tomb robbery and blending with rapevaders from all directions. Its pharaohs (who'd mostly been dumb wasteful arseholes for the past thousand years anyway, but still) were further delegitimized by the squabbles between their offspring, many or most of whom were now delivered via Semitic or Nubian concubines acquired from treaties with various clever "Asiatics."
Alexander the Great's reconquista of Egypt has been misinterpreted here for a very long time, primarily due to the misconception that Egyptians were always a mixed Semitic-Nubian people, and therefore, Alexander was just conquering them because he wanted to be "great." In its present actuality, the massing of a Europeoid-dominated force to drive back the Mongoloid and Negroid invaders who had broken the older states and peoples of the region, retake Egypt, and name a new capital after its nominal commander, should not be viewed as some random, childish act of "pursuing greatness," but rather as evidence that the (genuine) refugees at the time, and their descendants, understood what the region had been and who had built it, and still felt wronged by its loss. Nonetheless, Alexander's attempt to re-establish Europeoid rule failed (as we discussed in La Raza Cósmica), partly due to delusions of benevolent reintegration.
No doubt the mediators who helped coordinate this latest partly-internecine-, partly-race-war had a hand in guiding the young ruler toward the proper course. Alexander of Macedon--one of the offshoot kingdoms created after the splintering of the Middle East in the time of Egypt's collapse--returning to Egypt with an army is presented much as history has been presenting all European attacks against Semites (and vice versa) for a while now, namely as an endless drive to take things just because. In fact, Macedon was a Semite-dominated petty state under regular threat from all sides, caught up in wars machinated by the viziers and priests who had used such strategies to crack Egypt apart to begin with.
Strabo's description of the blended powers involved in the Alexander-derivative capital, and the original layout which itself expressed the patchwork plagiarization of peoples and religions which sparked Alexander's restructuring of the Middle East, is telling:
The city of Alexandria. Its commercial pre-eminence was based on three main harbors: the deep Great Harbor formed by Cape Lochias and Pharos island which was joined to the mainland by the artificial Heptastadium (also an aqueduct) and capable of taking the largest ships: Eunostos Harbor to the west: and the harbor on Lake Mareotis which received cargoes from inland which fed the export trade. The city's streets were designed on a chessboard pattern with the main thoroughfare, 30 meters wide, running east-west from the Cnobic Gate to the Gate of the Moon. The main quarters of the city were (from west to east) the Necropolis (famed for its gardens), Rhaktis (the Egyptian area), the Royal Quarter, and the Jewish Quarter.
The great expenses to which Alexander, and his conquered-peoples-embracing, Bureau of Indian Affairs-style resource-draining successors, put forth on behalf of the Europeoid foot-soldiers in order to embrace the heirs of stolen Egypt have been previously discussed. Concomitant with such behavior was, after a literate, architecturally competent protectorate had been established over some of the old territories, the spending of great sums to obtain and gather together all available histories and literature in the known world for the inspection and use of the gentle conquest's financiers. This sudden passion for creating storehouses of learning in what were, to the people who had supposedly decided upon this invasion, foreign lands, is typically explained as being due to the white race's "need for grandeur."
If, however, the results of having collected so many works together in Alexandria at that time period is viewed not with childlike marvel, but in practical terms of someone wishing to learn about what those humans had been up to and how to best manipulate them, the library's collection, archiving, and purging processes make sense. The evil criminal mastermind reads the dossier on the cop he is trying to bribe before knowing whether to send a steamy brunette, kidnap a firstborn, reveal old photographs, have an aging mother evicted from a rent-control apartment, et cetera. (When considering the importance of gaining lengthy access to literary sources during the time period in question, we must remember the absence of internets, Adobes, printing presses, and cultural openness with outsiders. For an outsider to gain access to a culture's sacred tales was a decidedly different task than at present.)
Shortly after Alexander's succession was helped apart with doses of greed, honeypotting, and assisted bullshit-believing, Berossus in the early 200s B.C. cranked out a compendium of religious tales. A selfish compiler in his own right, Berossus collected together and edited older myths in the region in a pro-Babylon way. Some of the Semites in the area gained access to this work somehow, along with many other Near Eastern cosmologies and origin stories. These they blended with the Akhenaten conception of the distant-yet-everywhere creator, and the Amun-Ra conceptual overgod expansion begun after Semitic advisers had started helping rearrange Egypt protect itself from Nubians and Libyans, and produced a close copy of the old Near Eastern origin stories, and sequels of the old favorite flood and fire and war stories: sequels in which, as still in 21st century Semitic media, the genetic profiles of the protagonists may change depending on desired agenda and current popularity. In these sequels, a certain subset of Semites, called "Jews," were both the greatest victors of the greatest battles and yet also the perpetually-suffering and unfairly-victimized slaves.
-Isn't it strange how modern scholars simply can't figure out exactly what was in that library, and exactly who destroyed it, or when, or why? We know of many "Bible tales" that were copied blatantly and honorlessly from the work of exterminated peoples, whose records, like Clinton-colleagues, survived countless accidents and indiscretions. Being chiseled into stone, or recorded on animal skins buried in deep dryness, some ancient records survived better than modern flesh-bags with loose lips. It seems to be a series of lucky, rare chances that preserved any Gnostic Gospels until the present day, and those had to survive a span of time several centuries shorter than things which would've been bought out and purged through that earlier north-Egyptian clearinghouse.
(Regarding the constantly inconstant racism of the rearranging Jews who Judaized Near Eastern history in their Pentateuch, consider anew the allusions this one has previously made to Star Trek. Star Trek has always been progressive, but not inherently for itself; rather, it has teased at the edges of what was currently acceptable. Ergo the first, mid-twentieth-century version staffed its officer corps with white-appearing males, permitting a token colored female to serve as the worthless officer responsible for being the captain's secretary, taking his calls, setting his appointments, and communicating with the ship's computer, which could speak by itself anyway. The enemies were modeled after staunch east Asian warriors, reflecting Gene Roddenberry's mixed desire to appeal to Anglo-Germanic TV audiences, yet to express his hatred of the culture that had been allied with Germany and Italy during the recent world war. A token "Japanese" Semitic homosexual, also male, offered what was then acceptable diversity on the bridge crew. The essential spirit of the narrative changed in harmony with not morals, but popular opinion, for it took years to become acceptable to Starfleet to make black males main characters, give women executive leadership positions, and make women combat-ready. None of these ideas were acceptable to the Star Trek writers in the original series, who have demonstrated both directly and via proxy over the decades that their definition of tolerance extends only as far as everyone else was already coming around to. No black homosexual couples serving as captain and XO; no transsexual Muslim admirals chairing the Starfleet officer prep division. Simultaneously, enemies were no longer permitted to be shallow, noxious caricatures of western preconceptions of stubborn samurai following a vulgar honor code.)
-You will die for the Emperor when He decrees it, Hiro, and not an instant before!
(The muddle of "YHVH," which was not much later psalmized as "Yah," was likely intended to be un-specific so that Yah/Rah could incorporate other cultures' myths, and thereby their gods, through plausible connectibility. The early Jewish refusal to consistently name their plagiarized partial clone of YMNRH/Amun-Ra, and their commandment not to talk about
Studying the particular way in which these first Jews plagiarized, with certain little details included or omitted, it's evident that they had used Berossus' compendium to do so. Suggested reading here is Gmirkin, which most publishers and libraries don't want to print or stock. In continuing Jewish tradition regarding YHVH's historical vacuuming, you can buy many speculative and many moral and many historical critiques of early Christianity, hundreds of speculative works about personal faith and denomination-posturing from authors present and recent, while a work citing physical evidence from the time period of the men who wrote down the foundational texts is un-printed and regularly commands over $100 for a used copy. It's a dense scholarly text, with massive citations to many different varieties of the early Near Eastern creation stories that were later plagiarized into the Pentateuch/Torah. Even though the plagiarism itself is obvious when compared to many earlier flood- and god-stories in the region, Gmirkin's work teases out numerous specifics indicating that it was Berossus' compendium the Jews used to fabricate their origins. Gmirkin's Berossus also very politely, without addressing racial issues at all, discusses the fabrication of the "Documentary Hypothesis" that Pentateuchal-believing scholars made the western standard for years, in order to prevent a widespread awareness of Genesis as being not merely fiction, but stolen fiction. The Jews replaced Babylonian heroes with Jewish heroes, unrelated battles with Jewish battles, and Byblos' enemies with Yahweh's enemies--acts which, if approached using the standards Nu Euro scholars applied to other historical works, would have had a colossal effect on the use and acceptability of the European human's adopted "Old Testament."
Given the centuries of scholarly reliance on various unsupported presumptions that the Pentateuch was creatively and/or spiritually written long before it was actually copied, the history of the Jewish peoples publicly available now is fabricated. When the Jews suddenly showed up near the end of productive Egypt, they began claiming thousands of years of history based on their Pentateuch. With the Pentateuch exposed as a barely 2300-year-old lie, the archaeological evidence for Jewry consists of cherry-picking pieces of other societies, particularly Arab ones, apart and claiming, "Oh, some of those were definitely Jews. They were totally ancient."
The Novel Ancients
What defines Jewishness or Judaism? The Israeli government offers its own genetic tests on the subject, which bear little relation to historical Jews, but which are instead designed to filter Ashkenazi and Sephardi groups away from other Jews. More-Europeoid carriers are assigned to condo developments, and less-Europeoid Semitic tribal variants are consigned forever to the status of "Arabs" et al. Sadly, humorously, maybe deservedly, yet still wrongly, the providers of what little archaeological evidence there is--of Semitic peoples living in the Middle East before Yahweh--came from those once-Jews who've been already killed by the IDF. "Exodus" and the (modern) Jews' oft-repeated notions of "being kicked out" and "forced to travel" are meant to explain the lack of archaeological evidence for their existence as any manner of recognizable group. Some people claim that Judaica is expressed as an endless record of prejudice because Jews are neurotic and like to talk about being persecuted. Not so--the histories of the Jewish peoples have to be histories of persecution, because, prior to about 300 B.C., the existence of Jews is purely hypothetical, and can only be speculated about based upon (1) presuming that a given archaeological site was related to a fictional story later recounted in plagiarized Jewish sources, or (2) presuming that a group of
Where, then, did Jenome a.k.a. Yahweh enter Terran history? What established Israel's genetic guidelines for Jewishness, and how come no identifiable society of such a people(s) existed prior to the plagiarization of the Near Eastern myths? Were the Jews such environmentally conscious ancients that they did always exist, but never left any records or artifacts prior to ~300 B.C.? Were they always in Egypt, but only rendered in art in the later dynasties, as foreigners, because of the Egyptians' deliberate attempts to deceive later historians? Were they an unwritten, unspoken sub-group of nigh-Arab Semites who declared their independence in ~300 B.C., then abruptly began producing evidence which distinguished their non-Arab existence in the same manner as other groups? Were they a Semitic tribe that had never previously developed writing or architecture, which happened to catch the attention of a roving interstellar organism that consumes life on a scale of time and matter unfathomable by modern Terran standards?
Whatever the case may be, there is no doubt that many a prestigious university can and will remedy this historical oversight. Indeed, using Islamic jihad to encourage Europeans to re-embrace the Torah, via Christianity, may smooth the process of memorializing biblical tales as historical fact--causing them to be viewed as metaphors of shared cultural history, rather than a co-option of other people's metaphors and/or beliefs. As an idea, the Torah was astoundingly successful. The writing and building cultures of the Middle East, like their later cousins in Europe, discarded their forefathers' histories, accepting instead the Torah's chronology. Even now, with their rocket-ships having disproved the untruth of the Torah--and with archaeological discoveries having been made which the Jews of the time did not anticipate, which discoveries revealed where and when the Torah and the "Jews" actually appeared--Europeans could be easily made to accept that the Jews really did originate thousands and thousands of years ago under a series of desert patriarchs. They can view Moses' discussion with a burning bush as "a metaphor for his coming to terms with his identity," and the parting of the Red Sea as "a stylized description of a great battle of liberation," while still accepting that there really were a composite series of Abram- and Moses-like leaders during the time periods claimed by the Bible. They can accept that Jews really were unfairly imprisoned in Egypt by evil pharaohs (rather than benevolently not executed for encouraging bedouins and Nubians to slaughter the people and raid the granaries/wombs), and that the suddenly-appearing Jews of the 300s-200s B.C. were always there, contributing just as much to the ancient myths of the Near East as other cultures who left behind pre-300 B.C. physical evidence. Like Akhenaten ordering his army to deface the shrines of all local gods, it has been, and will continue to be, quite easy for Terra's current rulers to adjust personal piety as they should desire.
The Yahweh god-concept was as flawed as it was stolen. Any internet atheist now can squeal with glee about the plethora of timelessly immoral, plagiarized, anti-scientific, and self-contradictory claims within the Yahweh works, though modern Terrans, particularly of the atheist variety, are conditioned to associate these issues primarily with Christianity, secondarily with Islam, and only barely, if at all, with Judaism. Yahweh is the only god, but Yahweh is jealous of other gods; the first people created were Adam and Eve, but when their son was going to head out into the world the world was already filled with other long-established peoples who had been themselves predated by long-established giants; all of that stuff. For our purposes here, though, we should consider the way in which Yahweh represented a Jewish attempt to create a centralized bureaucracy of divinity, and a false Jewish past, by consuming not only the myths of the smaller and older peoples and polities of the Middle East, but the recently ascendant overgod of Egypt.
In Yahweh, we see the recycling of the "centralization" concepts that had, a millennia ago, been employed to such great effect in Egypt through the Ra revisions. Centralization is efficient, and not malum in se, but Ra had been part of destroying Europe by encouraging the deferral of thinking, evaluating, security, spirituality, and other concepts to a distant authority. In the chaos caused by Egypt's protracted death, Yahweh was originally intended to become the world's sole god. The co-option of earlier historical concepts into a single product, the promises of all-powerful splendor, and the feigned length of history and survival, were supposed to make everyone envious to become chosen, mutilate their children, violate all prior traditions and social arrangements, and create a Jewish planet. The sudden appearance of the Jews on "the historical stage" was caused by the fall of some Semitic desert-rovers to Jenome; this was originally meant to encompass all under the Yahweh brand. Because Yahweh proved initially unsellable to Terrans in Africa and Europe, though, the concept had to be revised before it could have more of an effect on Terra.
Less than 300 years after the proud publication of the Jews' make-believe history, the Jewish would-be Maschiah showed up and, rather than conquering Jerusalem for the Jews, was crucified by the Romans for sedition.
(Teehee, it's cute to think that if you believed the Torah, Bernard Baruch was actually the Maschiah. Although, who really conquered Jerusalem? The first British infantryman to march in across the bones of however many dead Jerusalem-Semites? The sergeant commanding that foot soldier? The lieutenant commanding that sergeant? Not Jews. And when was Jerusalem actually conquered-conquered? Depending on how persecuted they feel at any given time, it's not really conquered until everyone else is dead, or at least everyone in the nameless region which some racists call "Palestine.")
Too open an assault on Europe, that final major attempt at converting people to more quickly become Jenomic; to throw off their societies, mutilate their children, and become illusorily victimized roamers. The next attempt would be a subtler one.
Relevant reading here is Zuesse, which does a good job of breaking down the Saul/Paul story, but which is painfully repetitive, overuses capitalization and italics, blames Saul for Hitler but not Charlemagne et al., and is warm and respectful toward the Torah. If you already know the Saul thing, you probably won't get anything new there. Some pluses, though, are the details Zuesse gets into on circumcision as the dividing issue for converting gentiles, speaking to the ongoing Semitic desire to sexually mutilate all humans, and also, Zuesse mentions the non-religious historical reference to Jesus' execution by Romans, which is very un-internet-atheist in its remembrance (since atheists prefer to believe there never was a rabbi named Jesus).
Like street gangs coming together to control the drug trade, the incidents and ideas associated with the Torah turned certain Semites into Chosen-Semites. Those who were not so chosen, or who did not sign on, but insisted upon an honest identity, would later receive, and are still receiving, a terrible vengeance. For daring to possess a lengthy, archaeologically traceable history complete with artifacts and many original customs, the Arab peoples--actual extant Semites of old, with actual homelands and actual Terran-derivative construction--are, necessarily, doomed.
When we see Jesus as having been engaged in outreach to gentiles, encouraging conversion and circumcision and kosher eating and overthrowing another large Europeoid polity, we recognize him as a sign of the raiders' northering. Egypt had fallen, and Rome was to do the same. During his lifetime and shortly thereafter, Jesus failed to get the Romans to mutilate themselves, defy their leaders, and invite the world. Once Jesus was gone, Saul's retelling of the story into a non-circumcising, pro-imperial, vaguely peaceful and warlike (sic) ideology did the trick. "Obey the chosen" became "we're all chosen, so just obey Yahweh." And this worked. Rome took the Egyptian route, embracing Jenomic centralism/universalism, bringing in financiers and laboring immigrants, mutilating children when they were too young to object, and forming closer partnerships with Saul's counterparts in Turkey.
Like his predecessors who'd worked on Yahweh, Saul liberally mined Egyptian mythology for his revised Jesus story, tossing in hints of paganism, virgins, and rebirth. Much of the Middle Eastern reaction to the idea of the historical Christ narrative involved connecting faith in Christ to much-earlier Egyptian rituals regarding the Hall of the Two Truths, where souls would be judged after death to determine the quality of their afterlife--a recurrent theme in Europeoid-derived philosophies, seen also in its more-commonly-known Greek contemporaries. Early Jenomic myths had attempted to sever integration with the life process by encouraging faith in short-term conquest, which appealed sufficiently to the early Jews, but other Terran groups retained sufficient connection to the perpetual nature of the life process to wholly reject the Torah's declaration of genetic warfare. Ergo the next product, ~300 years later, required some kind of afterlife.
Saul took these elements of older Egyptian religion, which added heavy doses of Caucasoid-generated traditionalism, and then, like a good merchant, connected older tradition with newer, mixing these better-known plot elements with the more recent Ra-esque reforms which emphasized a distant-yet-close god. He combined personal piety with donations to a centralized religious authority that provided regional representation. Consider the proliferation of the national/global banking association in 2017, wherein customers want a familiar logo that appears nationwide or worldwide, the ability to access ATMs while traveling, but also want to visit a local banking branch under the sign of that same banner, and converse with fleshly representations of "Chase Bank" et al. Still, today, academic institutions (and associated employees) are considered worthless without the blessing of the centralized authority via accreditation and tithing; martial arts schools must generally trace their lineages to a more broadly known authority figure via tithing to a series of intermediary modern masters; and, church branches are expected to be similarly accredited to a larger, generally-known mass association that ordinates ritual media and delivering individuals. This process, whether valuable or merely a costly but genuine necessity, is inextricably bound to the re-interpretation of Amun-Ra as an over-god, which had occurred during the earlier stages of Egypt's fall thousands of years ago. The newer, history-less "Maschiah" used by Saul against Rome similarly replaced earlier Caucasoid gods--and all the relevant social-, communal-, environmental-, and genetic-bonding associated therewith--with a singular over-god who had the power to incorporate sellout aspects of local faiths by sainting them, and who similarly had the power to destroy resisting deities forever by naming them "heresy." Even many too-white Christ-faiths met this fate, as we discussed in The Perversion of Christianity.
Saul pre-loaded Christianity with the bureaucracy- and delegation-aspects of later Ra-worship and rabbinical Yahweh-worship. To these more brazenly financial components of the religion, it took Nu Euro survivors over a thousand years to begin to make slight objections. Even in their absence--after a whistleblower revealed that he, too, thought the NSA/IRS had gone too far--Nu Euros consistently wanted and want to return to administrative bloat, proving how excellent was Saul's reading of the Euro mind, wherein churches that insist upon higher membership fees and provide more pomp are far more patronized, and materially rewarded, than others. In addition, whitening post-Nicean Christ-representations helped lesser Europeans trust in this unmarried, childless, infant-cutting rabbi who led a bunch of men through the desert talking about the importance of the Abramic covenant, and the providence of giving resources away to foreigners who hit one in the face.
Aspects of Judaism: Distend; Centralize
To make possible the changes to Egypt we've reviewed, the Middle Kingdom had to, in part, begin accepting "Asiatic" traders outside of "market" days, and that is what the traditional, gene-averse archaeological and textual record permits itself to see. Like so many cinematic Christian Württembergs, it appears that the Euros then were seduced by their desire for status-indicators, which, like the predominance of cliches and sequels under generalized entertainment, become necessary under an impersonal, centralized authority. Those minds incapable of dealing autonomously with mass society (those "who do not know each other anymore") draw upon simpler cues, like vehicular status or pictures of vacations.
-The trade in lapis lazuli--which was necessary to permit the Nu Euros to celebrate via enduring statuary their possession of lighter eye coloration than their enemies--became part of the opening of Egypt to the facilitators of trade.
-The foolish Natives sold
Savvy traders with a longer view of the future were able to trick gullible Egyptian leaders into granting them citizenships and advisory posts, which they used to alter pedagogy and generalize community expectations in a way that would later be conducive to African pharaohs and the lifting of prior defense policies ("immigration restrictions").
(Modern figures of celebrity--Lorde, Lana del Rey, Eminem--emphasize the unknownness of their commonesque roots, speaking to the notion that there are still "localities" with "character" out there somewhere, however horrid those are compared to a safe, loving, and respectable London, Columbia, or Los Angeles upbringing.)
Mayors and town councils, and debates over the school board, today serve something of this fading function, but ever since the mega-worship of Ra became imposed, the distinguishing character of local leadership has been its ability to keep the commoners calm about directives from Rome. The local superintendent of schools, or the priest who counsels his membership about the wisdom of the central authority, is retained, regardless of his adherence to the underlying faith, while he who does otherwise invites central wrath and loses his post. Ergo a superintendent who produces well-read, job-ready graduates without wasting X semesters pumping test scores, is removed, while a superintendent who produces a decade of jobless illiterates with reasonable test scores is rewarded. Alternatively, a priest who talks to everyone about Jesus in a crumbling old dance hall with no HDTVs gradually loses "his" flock to the beautiful new parish across the way with two floors of activity rooms and those four hip dudes who are so good with the younger faithful and who, unbeknownst to the world's idiots, were quietly transferred in from other places for molesting kids. Like failure to promote in civil service, these things pass quietly; most Nu Euros just naturally gravitate toward shinier stuff, don't think too deeply into "retired" or "just moved here" stories, and life goes on. Age can be either help or hindrance in evaluating changing institutions over time; sometimes, older community members can see standards changing, and recognize something of what's going on; other times, they despair over death and loneliness, and embrace the strings of faux-community still dangling from the Columbia balloon.
Killer of Gods
The rise of the supreme Ra proved itself more disrespectful to the over-god Ra, and to the ordinary-god Ra, than any prior attacks on Egypt's mythology or its people. This process, which led to the relegation of Ra--whether as divine being or as metaphorical in-joke-style expression of ethnic bonding--to the status of an either implausible or outdated myth, is mirrored in the use of later god figures whose heavily promoted worship resulted in stripping that god/meme of all its powers. In Christ versus Science, we see one such example of a newer flawed tool replacing an older flawed one, with animosity on either "side."
Regarding the Egypt that we can learn something of in 2017 Terra, we've considered several of the ways that various Semitic groups, Jenomically masterminded, were able to destroy a civilization, and a people, slowly and subtly, by consolidating its gods as first superior, then irrelevant. The demographics involved are common enough: Jenomic carriers, possessed of preternatural coordination and an inexorable sense of purpose, set about over-grooming a vulnerable trait of a target population, then exploited everyday greed, legitimate anger at the offensive impurity of the change, and legitimate anger at the offensive rejection of tradition, to have everyone in the target group fighting and betraying each other. Ironically, by crafting a supreme, centralized Ra, the Jenomic mediators ultimately destroyed Ra, whereas by leaving him as one of many local and/or national deities, he might have survived.
Jenome digests the dying in friendly, local, organic ways--not cremation by advanced fleets of spaceship. To be a yawning maggot, forever hungry, leaves one possessed of appetite but averse to creation. Like intestinal bacteria that begin the process of decomposing dead human bodies, Jenome uses local resources to its ends. This is why we see, in these processes, the repurposing of ideas into useful (as to pestilence and decay) versions of themselves, rather than the arrival of purely new, alien tales.
Nu Euros are permitted, today--even encouraged--to mock the Nicean Bible for its many scientific problems. They are even encouraged to critique aspects of the Pentateuch as being part of a rich tradition of self-glamorizing origin stories that drew upon shared human components. What they are not encouraged to do is specify how the borrowing, plagiarizing, spinning, and/or metaphorizing of many other origin stories had, in the Jewish version, (1) a specifically sub-genetic component in their fabrication and use, which (2) falsified history not only so as to adopt the plot styles as their own, but so as to invalidate all other gods and traditions, (3) feign being the original source for the material, rather than, as the other origin stories had, interconnecting gods and heroes with older shared traditions, and (4) use the stories as evidence for having always been Terran. Even in the earliest stages of Jenomic infection, Terran writers would refer to any group of ancient desert-wanderers at-hand as "Jews of antiquity," when the said group had been so claimed as ancestors by contemporary Jews.
The genetic argument made in service of anti-Semitism, or anti-Judaism-specifically, is incomplete. The story-robbers who abruptly seized a historical identity and became called "Jews" may have been successful roving Semitic pillagers prior to available recorded history, but at a certain point, some of them became very different. And this difference has persisted, throughout many and varied genetic forms, proving to be an unduly resistant characteristic despite any potential intermix or temporal motivation.
At any necessary phase of history, "the" Jews have been able to cast aside many, even a majority, of their kindred, and be complicit or active in the slaughter thereof of people who were, previously, "Jewish." The destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the invasion of Palestine are two recent examples, whereby a genetic group that had the power to import its members into the most prosperous places in the world instead slaughtered parts of itself. This one has touched on this phenomenon before, in Immibortion Policy 1:
Because many Semites native or partially-native to the region physically resemble each other, the risk of fresh colonists (Jews) being confused with prior inhabitants (Druze, Arabs, various more-or-less Asiatic/African Semites--like the modern Holocaust story, even the dramatic official tally of "victims" is not limited strictly to Palestinian Arabs), it is necessary for Jewish settlers to distinguish themselves through costuming (modern western), grooming (again, more akin to modern western, to provide a suitable contrast with Palestinian Arabs), speech patterns, et cetera, lest they be mistaken at a distance for Arabs. It isn't a simple matter of skin tone or facial bone structure; Israelis are good at recognizing the subtleties of their own, but non-maternal Jewish Semites, e.g. rapespawn from 1948 onward, are considered rightless Arabs, eligible for random military execution, even if they are, per modern Terran science, equally genetically Jewish. Specifically, this means that if a Jewish Semitic woman purposefully bears the child of a Europeoid man, the child will be genetically Semitic and legally Jewish, whereas if a Jewish man rapes an Arab woman--say, the frequent IDF-on-teenage-girl by force or in exchange for calories or water--and the recipient becomes pregnant, the resulting child will not be eligible for citizenship, because of an inadequately registered genetic line.Although the recent exterminations in Armenia and Palestine are easier to contemplate, this process recurs in Jewish history, wherever it becomes more advantageous for the Jenomic project to continue using a different kind of medium. Many of the North African and Middle Eastern states who conducted purges of Jews, or who coordinated with the Nicean/Roman church and the European crusader-states to have Jews slaughtered in Europe or en route to crusade, were controlled by or financed by other Jews. In an interesting turn of events foreshadowing the successive betrayal of many Jews later, early Jews who sneaked into Memphis to worship the golden Apis Bull were themselves pilloried and thrown to the Egyptians, then condemned in the Torah itself. Their betrayal by their kinsmen was later called justified, as a mere act of God; their work integrating with the local Egyptian religion was scorned, and they were dropped from history. In an alternate timeline, where Apis Bull outshone Ra based on Europeoid preference, those Bull-Jews might have killed off the Yahweh-Jews, and the Catholics would be worshiping feedlot porn rather than crucifixion porn. Exodus 32 would instead read:
If you go to certain parts of Israel, you can see this: under the non-western hairstyles, clothing, and other less pleasant effects of Zionism, the non-citizen genetic legacy of the area, rapespawn and alternately hapless, could otherwise pass for Jewish. Consider, e.g., the costuming of the royals of the Jewish House of Saud, who through careful later marriage and elaborate costuming, make themselves out to be merely partly Jewish-Semitic (as well as the obligatory "when in Rome" Arab-Semitic admixture). This isn't meant as an insult nor a compliment to the non-citizen peoples of the various untouchable "Arab" ghettos of Israel, but as an example of the visual quandary faced by the IDF. How many Jews are killed without anyone knowing, or wanting to know, that they were genetically Jews, we'll never know. A Lovecraftian--or, perhaps better put, Kafkaesque--situation exists in Israel, for those Jews who are quietly never tested due to improper or informal parentage, and whose later deaths are recorded as due to the corpse's supposed act of Arab terrorism. This is, incidentally, the end-goal of Jewish-influenced nationalisms for other peoples as well: a horrorscape of shifting states of belonging and not-belonging, where government willingness to analyze or process tests, or to make or maintain records, is a permission that can be withdrawn wherever convenient. Gaza is a holocaust of Arabs, but also one of Jews, though history must necessarily forget that, during this period, the IDF was also executing genetic Jews. Not only must it bleed foreign hosts; Israel eats itself to survive.
When the people saw that Moses was so long in coming down from the mountain, they gathered around Aaron and said, “Come, make us gods who will go before us. As for this fellow Moses who brought us up out of Egypt, we don’t know what has happened to him.”This is not the behavior of a genetic group using kinship links to survive; there is, rather, another, more powerful, more essential factor inside the groups sometimes called "Jews" that is itself interested in pursuing an end, regardless of the "evolutionary success" of whoever, retroactively, becomes called a Jew. The whitish Jews who dominate the world now, and the Han ones who may do so tomorrow, have not and will not stop to preserve the lineages of any genetic likenesses deemed retroactively outdated. Crypto Ashkenazi have brutalized once-Jew "Arabs" to extreme degrees, only to subsequently create a potential world caliphate in which crypto Arabic leaders would later execute the core of the Ashkenazim ruling lines. It's not about the evolutionary survival or success of human-derived genomes. Something else drives the destruction.
Aaron answered them, “Take off the gold earrings that your wives, your sons and your daughters are wearing, and bring them to me.” So all the people took off their earrings and brought them to Aaron. He took what they handed him and made it into an idol cast in the shape of a sun, fashioning it with a tool. Then they said, “These are your gods, Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt." ... When Moses approached the camp and saw the golden disc and the dancing, his anger burned and he threw the tablets out of his hands, breaking them to pieces at the foot of the mountain. And he took the sun-disc the people had made and burned it in the fire; then he ground it to powder, scattered it on the water and made the Israelites drink it
What factor this is which influences these thousands of years of behavior does not necessarily need to be an interstellar decomposition agent. We might mundanely contemplate some as-yet undiscovered Terran organism which uses human hosts to survive, and which thrives only in genetic-derived structures possessing certain characteristics. Perhaps this is why the organism doesn't mind sacrificing so many of its once-hosts to the cause.
Inside of a few millennia, dusky, coy flatterers have become pasty, arch-critical software engineers. Negroids, Mongoloids, and Caucasoids (Nu Euros) are still essentially themselves, while the Jenomic carriers have, but for the infection, become something almost entirely different than what they wore before. There is little if any hope of helping a dying world study this impartially and take appropriate action, for even the idealized appropriate genetic response would leave sizable traces, and new rotting godlings would obtain ready worship from the ashen masses. The disparity in intelligence and unity, and the horrid adaptability of the carrier, indicate the superiority of the natural process that is here occurring. This very superiority is, by its nature, attractive to the fearful, and leads them to become envious of the participants in the consumptive process. ("Why can't we have a wall, too?") It grows far darker, for this is only a few millennia in. Yet a few ones, even now and here, will appreciate, and anticipate, the beauty of the overall process. Not in the sense of sniffing luridly about corpses, nor of enjoying ignorant drooling at the expense of learning how to swallow. Rather, in intelligently avoiding the despair that will otherwise lead the self to pursue the path of service as a digestive drone.