So I had an acquaintance when Obama was going to be elected, and I told him, "Don't support him, he voted over and over again for occupying Iraq, he's a killer of children and you don't want to lend even a tiny bit of support to that." And he told me, "Women good, gays good, McCain bad." And I said, "Yeah, McCain bad, but Obama is complicit in an international murder cartel and it's so very immoral and personally damaging and wrong to support anything like that." And he responded, "Women good, gays good, McCain bad."
We went around a few times like that, and finally, he said, "I admire you, you have such a big heart, for being able to care about those millions of children so far away, but women good, gays good, McCain bad, and it would just break me if I had to care about everyone out there, I can't do it, I admire you if you can have such an exposed soul to all that stuff, but I have to think about things here, first. Women good, gays good, McCain bad."
When it was another Obama election, we did the same thing. Now, there was no chance of concealing Obama's mass murders in the hubris of a Congress for which he was somehow not responsible; now, Obama had personally overseen execution after execution after execution of thousands upon thousands of little kids, both collateral and direct, and now he was an arch-murderer in the most vulgar, literal, cowardly sense. He had looked at pictures, had had explained to him endless minutiae about victims and areas of effect, and had kept going, year after year after year, boom bang kill, until even the background blur of another three dead toddlers had vanished from the front page of even the most dissident of dissident presses, replaced by some new abomination Obama was wreaking in a different corner of the world. Piles of dead children all across Africa, and he didn't give a damn because "women good, gays good, Romney bad."
And then came the invasion of Europe, where the worse half of those same miscellaneous and violent and victimized peoples began to invade western Europe, and all of a sudden, my acquaintance switched around. Now, weirdly, his heart was big enough to care about those people--at least, the 18-40 year-old males. Domestic issues suddenly shifted to the back burner, if at all, and more important than his home, his family, his community, were the attitudes of Europeans (far away) toward the invaders (far away), and his heart was gigantic and gigantically inflamed in favor of the invaders. He cared! The Grinch's heart grew three sizes that news cycle, amazingly, impossibly, indecipherably.
What made this switch happen? Not only did this switch happen, it didn't affect his attitude about the earlier victims. He was as callous as before about flying death robots blowing up little kids in Pakistan, incinerated weddings in Iraq, boy-rape rings in Afghanistan...none of that had changed. I said, "Don't support Hillary, she's complicit in an international murder cartel and it's so very immoral and personally damaging and wrong to support anything like that." And he responded, "Women good, gays good, Trump bad."
Wtf, man? I still have the Faceberg messages from 2008 of him telling me, "it would just break me if I had to care about everyone out there," "I respect you if you have such a big heart," which would make sense if he was supporting the Zionist Gorgon on a misguidedly selfish policy, but how did he manage to combine that with intensive caring about African refugees who are looting and raping their way across Europe? He proactively cares for the so-called refugees, but he proactively doesn't care about the little black kids starving by the tens of thousands because one of Obama's warlord buddies incinerated the family fields and goats. He will go to a bar and shout and knock over peanut-jars in response to the injustice of deporting a single Somali rapist from the U.S., but when I mention that a two-year-old in Pakistan was crushed to death inside a building collapsed by one of Obama's drones, he doesn't give a fuck.