Thursday, February 23, 2017

Retrospective Abortions

From the vantage point of 2017, did they force Princess Diana to have that abortion of Dodi Fayed's child to avoid presaging the immigrant rape crisis too early? Roughly twenty years ago, the mass rapes and actual rape culture would've been unthinkable, miscegenationally speaking, to the average Euro- or Ameridrone, but if the Princess had openly and enthusiastically foreshadowed it all with a little Fayed, it might've been too much of the twenty-first century too soon, and the lines more easily identifiable, ergo rejectable. A 1997 or 1998 backlash, rather than a 2016 or 2017 one, could've caused the battle lines to be drawn in more apparent locations, and required neopoliticalisms to show more of their cards too soon, leaving Eurodrones able to focus on kings rather than on pawns.


  1. Gaytopia's heroine, Princess Diana, probably fucked Fayed willingly, cucking Charles in the bargain. Doubt it was rape. Charles probably is impotent and the Royal Tykes probably have questionable parentage.

    1. If the line could reproduce to the point of Charles, I'm sure Charles and his physicians could manage some sort of similarly procreative ritual--as many as necessary. But no, Dodi certainly wasn't physical rape in the sense of "Diana" having "consented."

  2. Also, think of this: it would have been much easier to justify Operation: Iraqi Freedom post-nynah-leaven as a United States - United Kingdom project (which is what it is/was anyway) if someone could pin rape on The Dodester, but at the same time, there's a little PR problem arising out of Chuck the Cuck, so maybe....?